Re: Sieve reject action and environment test extension

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> Alexey Melnikov writes:
>
> > After thinking more about comments received regarding the reject 
> > draft, I would propose that instead of adding options to reject that 
> > would make it behave "do X if able to reject message over protocol 
> > and nothing otherwise" (originally proposed by Kejtil, if I am not 
> > mistaken), we should define proper Sieve environment test extension. 
> > The extension should define something for testing if Sieve engine is 
> > running in MTA/MDA, versa running in MDA.
> That's not equivalent. The equivalent would be "is sieve engine 
> running in MTA/MDA, and do all recipients of this invoke the reject 
> action?". 
Yes, I meant this. Actually both "can reject over protocol" and "running 
in MTA/MDA" can be interesting for Sieve scripts.
> That seems a little odd for an enviroment test extension. If course 
> it's possible to simplify a little and ask e.g. "is sieve engine 
> running in MTA/MDA, and is this a single-recipient message?" which 
> still seems out of scope for an environment test.
I think it is close enough. I would certainly not like to invent a new 
environment-like mechanism just for reject.