Aaron Stone writes:
Wait, I'm confused. Is it the SHOULD itself that you disagree with, or
that the text sets up confusion for sieves outside of the context of
a user's own sieve?
IMO that particular confusion is OK. There's lots of text that assumes
the message recipient owns the sieve script already. I just don't want
to add a SHOULD that assumes so.
In general I appreciate simple text, and will often choose readability
over exact accuracy. But SHOULDs and MUSTS should be accurate rather
than readable.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve