[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [sieve] review of draft-freed-sieve-notary-06

2010-03-25 07:21:15
On 03/24/2010 10:45 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
Well, seeing as how there's an example of how to use orcpt that
includes the rfc822; prefix, I'm not sure what else is needed here.

I think you added that after my review ;) Good thing I didn't release the code.

> I suggest this say "with xtext encoding (RFC 3461 section 4) removed".

I'd prefer that a script sees addresses in only one format.

Why is this justifiable:
envelope :orcpt :is "rfc822;max(_at_)example(_dot_)org"
when we also have
envelope :from :is "max(_at_)example(_dot_)org"

Because not all ORCPT values in practice are RFC 822 addresses.

Good point (he says, in a sad voice).

sieve mailing list