On 10/11/2010 10:49 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
The working group last call ends on these three documents tomorrow
(Tuesday, 12 Oct). I will post new versions of these tomorrow, which
address all the comments posted during the WGLC period. If anyone
else has anything to say, please post your comments now. Thanks.
=======
vacation-seconds
Section 2 heading
nit:
< 2. 'Seconds' Parameter
> 2. The ':seconds' Parameter
=======
autoreply
no comments. +1
=======
notify-presence
The value of "unknown" should be explicity listed in section 2 for each
item that can return that value, rather than being mentioned in passing
at the end of section 2.
I think it would be worth putting a note in somewhere that an
implementation may wish to cache the results of a call to
notify_method_capability so that if it is used in a series of if/else
tests, it only needs to be retrieved once.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve