Hi Ned/Stephan,
NED+mta-filters(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
[...]
For example, analogous to
application/sieve and the .siv/.sieve extension, the XML variant could
be specified as application/sieve+xml and with a .xsieve or perhaps a
.sieve.xml file extension. I haven't seen any discussions about this on
the mailing list.
But maybe I am just nitpicking, since I don't have a direct
application/need for this myself. :)
No, I think it's a good idea. I just don't quite know what process to
use.
Alexey, do you have any thoughts on this?
I think writing a short draft with the registration would be the best
way. Unless you want to revise RFC 5784?
Regards,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve