Hi,
Are there people here who can do additional reviews of the draft?
Thank you,
Alexey
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Date: 7 May 2013 23:24:30 GMT+01:00
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG, since
there is no longer a sieve WG. It is a relatively short document and appears
to fall within our charter.
We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone through
small, tight WGs so far. Before issuing a formal call for adoption, I'd like
to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people currently following
APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and constructive commentary. A
virtual show of hands, please?
Alternatively, the ADs may wish to spin up another short-lived WG to handle
this. Barry or Pete, care to comment?
-MSK, co-chairin'
_______________________________________________
apps-discuss mailing list
apps-discuss(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve