Apologies for the lateness of this reply.
On May 11, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
<kjetilho(_at_)ifi(_dot_)uio(_dot_)no> wrote:
on. den 10. 05. 2017 klokka 17.05 (-0700) skreiv RFC Errata System:
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5015
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Stan Kalisch <stan(_at_)glyphein(_dot_)mailforce(_dot_)net>
Section: 3.2
Original Text
-------------
# Imagine the header
# Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out
if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" {
# will hold "acme-users",
# will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out"
fileinfo "INBOX.lists."; stop;
}
Corrected Text
--------------
# Imagine the header
# Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out
if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" {
# will hold "acme-users",
# will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out"
fileinto "INBOX.lists."; stop;
}
Notes
-----
This suggestion corrects the spelling of the "fileinto" action in the
example.
mea culpa! the fix is correct.
aside: it is interesting that the mail copy of this notification has
removed the "${1}" and "${2}" from the text. it is correct in the web
version.
I noticed the omissions still existed in the emailed notification of the
verification of the errata. Does anyone know if the cause of this has been
fixed?
Stan
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve