Hi Stan,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are aware of this bug in the
mails
created and plan to fix it. We will add this case to testing.
RFC Editor/mf
On Jun 5, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Stan Kalisch
<stan(_at_)glyphein(_dot_)mailforce(_dot_)net> wrote:
Apologies for the lateness of this reply.
On May 11, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
<kjetilho(_at_)ifi(_dot_)uio(_dot_)no> wrote:
on. den 10. 05. 2017 klokka 17.05 (-0700) skreiv RFC Errata System:
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5015
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Stan Kalisch <stan(_at_)glyphein(_dot_)mailforce(_dot_)net>
Section: 3.2
Original Text
-------------
# Imagine the header
# Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out
if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" {
# will hold "acme-users",
# will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out"
fileinfo "INBOX.lists."; stop;
}
Corrected Text
--------------
# Imagine the header
# Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out
if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" {
# will hold "acme-users",
# will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out"
fileinto "INBOX.lists."; stop;
}
Notes
-----
This suggestion corrects the spelling of the "fileinto" action in the
example.
mea culpa! the fix is correct.
aside: it is interesting that the mail copy of this notification has
removed the "${1}" and "${2}" from the text. it is correct in the web
version.
I noticed the omissions still existed in the emailed notification of the
verification of the errata. Does anyone know if the cause of this has been
fixed?
Stan
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve