[What has been updated is the list of I-D's so it matches what
actually has been sent to the I-D archive. Thanks to Yakov for
keeping track of the list of documents. /paf]
MTA Authorization Records in DNS (marid)
Thursday, March 4 at 0900-1130
==============================
CHAIRS: Patrik Faltstrom <paf(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
Ted Hardie <hardie(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>
DESCRIPTION:
This meeting will review a set of related proposals for the DNS publication
of data which authorizes SMTP senders within a specific domain. The proposals
to be discussed vary in the proposed resource record type, syntax,
and operation,
but all include DNS publication of data intended to allow validation of IP
address, envelope, or originator header data for SMTP MTAs.
This BoF will be strictly limited to measures related to MTA authentication; no
other anti-spam measures or topics will be considered. The BoF will explicitly
consider how DNS-based MTA authentication mechanisms would be implemented and
deployed, and it will consider the impact on the overall DNS infrastructure of
this deployment.
This meeting will discuss whether or not an IETF working group is needed to
continue work on this topic.
AGENDA:
Agenda Bashing 5
Problem Overview 35
Taking draft-irtf-asrg-lmap-discussion-01.txt as a starting point,
this discussion
will focus on the problem these proposals attempt to solve, the broad outlines
of the solution space proposed, and the constraints implied by that solution
space.
Current Proposals (1 hour together)
MTAMARK - draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-01.txt
DRIP - draft-brand-drip-02.txt
RMX - draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-03.txt
DMP - draft-fecyk-dmp-01.txt
SPF - draft-mengwong-spf-00.txt
FSV - draft-levine-fsv-00.txt
Implications for the DNS 15
Based on the current proposals, the BoF will discuss how this
approach generally
and each proposal specifically interacts with the DNS.
Implications for SMTP 15
Based on the current proposals, the BoF will discuss how this
approach generally
and each proposal specifically interacts with existing and proposed mechanisms
for mail transfer.
Discussion of scope for IETF work 20