Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on.
2004-04-17 04:46:44
Matthew Elvey writes:
Statements like this helped set the press' expectation: "Identifying
the sender of e-mail won't elminate 100% of the spam problem, but
[it] may get 50% to 80%" I'm not aware of any information that would
support this claim of Paul Mockapetris'
I think we all agree that it would get one "half" of the problem: The
obnoxious misdirected bounces.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., (continued)
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Matthew Elvey
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Marshall Rose
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Alan DeKok
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Matthew Elvey
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on.,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Greg Connor
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Tony Finch
- Re: Rough consensus reached. Let's move on., Markus Stumpf
- Re: User experience, Alan DeKok
RE: User experience, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: User experience, Harry Katz
Multiple classes of mail, Meng Weng Wong
|
|
|