william(at)elan.net wrote:
[..] I was joking because while this may seem like a way out,
in no way do I think it should be done or that it'll ever fly
by IETF top guys. We should never attempt to completely take
over somebody else record, that is a very bad precident for IETF.
Then, which one out of the three alternatives I posted yesterday would
you recommend (or add your own)?
1. We do it quick and dirty with TXT.
2. We do it right and slow with a new RR type.
3. We say that we'll go with 1 as a temporary
measure and with 2 in the long run.
Michel.