Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records

I would appreciate it if this thread were dedicated to the technicaldiscussion of the variability of SPF vs. XML, as Jim is trying to show.If you have comments about the need or requirement for extensibility,then please use another thread (preferably the one Greg started on XMLunity). This does not mean your opinion is invalid. I would just likethese threads separated so people can track them more easily.


-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
On Extensibility in MARID Records, Jim Lyon Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Jonathan Gardner Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Andrew Newton Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Douglas Otis RE: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Michael R. Brumm Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Andrew Newton <= Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Greg Connor Against Extensibility in MARID Records, John T Levine The vast world of XML (Was: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Stephane Bortzmeyer RE: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Jim Lyon Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Marshall Rose Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Marshall Rose Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Margaret Olson Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Jonathan Gardner Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Luis Bruno Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records], Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	RE: XML exploits, Michael R. Brumm
Next by Date:	Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR, Douglas Otis
Previous by Thread:	RE: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Michael R. Brumm
Next by Thread:	Re: On Extensibility in MARID Records, Greg Connor
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]