Re: Why XML

ietf-mxcomp

Re: Why XML

2004-06-22 10:49:45



On 22. Jun 2004, at 17:38, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

The angle bracket stuff is completely irrelevant as far as I and mostotherXML coders are concerned. It is like x86 assembly code, I know it isthere
but I don't want to see it.

Exactly, most everyone doesn't want to see it either. Which is why itdoesn't belong in DNS.

If it would be true that XML is the format to use then DNS should onlycontain a pointer to it.


Chris

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Why XML, (continued) RE: Why XML, terry Re: Why XML, Hadmut Danisch Re: Why XML, Sean Comeau Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis Re: Why XML, Matthew Elvey Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis Re: Why XML, Matthew Elvey Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis Will SPF/Unified SPF/SenderID bring down the 'net?, Matthew Elvey Re: Will SPF/Unified SPF/SenderID bring down the 'net?, Douglas Otis Re: Why XML, Chris Zumbrunn <= Re: Why XML, Hadmut Danisch RE: Why XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Why XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Why XML, Roy Badami RE: Why XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Why XML, terry Re: Why XML, Chris Zumbrunn Re: Why XML, scott Re: Why XML, Hadmut Danisch

Previous by Date:	RE: Why XML, terry
Next by Date:	RE: Why XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Previous by Thread:	Re: Will SPF/Unified SPF/SenderID bring down the 'net?, Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	Re: Why XML, Hadmut Danisch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]