In <00c201c45924$2e50f9d0$6401a8c0(_at_)hdev1> "Hector Santos"
<hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com> writes:
----- Original Message -----
From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
Caller-ID is dead. It looks like XML will be dead by the end of the
week.
I think it is important for the MARID group see what you think.
Well, I don't know if it is normal business practices of Santronics
Software, Inc to take private email conversations public, but I will
stand by what I was quoted saying.
Whether MicroSoft adopts $MARID or not, I really doubt that they will
stick with the Caller-ID XML schema (the context of the private
emails). Their newer Sender-ID XML schema is both more compact and
more powerful. So, yes, I think that Caller-ID is dead.
And, yes, it looks to me like XML will be dead by the end of the
week. I'm sure everyone here is perfectly capable of deciding how
this looks to them. I really doubt that everyone sees eye-to-eye on
this issue.
Which brings up another important point related to what you like to bring up
much: Total SPF domains currently published vs. MCEP.
Yes, as I mentioned in my private email to you, I plan on publishing
an update to my 1.3 million email domain name search today, now that
I'm below the 3-post/day suggested limit.
-wayne