wayne wrote:
This would mean that SPF2 records would not *have* to be used for the
PRA. It would also allow SPF2 records to be used for SPF-classic
usage. For the vast majority of domains that have the same policies
for both the PRA usage and the SPF usage, people could publish:
SPF2 "spf2.0/spf,pra ..."
Nice idea. I also like your proposal to rename include: to
"if-pass:" (or similar).
Maybe now is also the time to drop SOFTFAIL, UNKNOWN should be
good enough, and "exists:" allows debugging without the active
help of the recipient.
Bye, Frank