Re: SPF is not an antispam technology

ietf-mxcomp

Re: SPF is not an antispam technology

2004-08-22 12:38:22



On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Dean Anderson wrote:

Likewise, if spam isn't stopped by SPF/SenderID/MARID, then those projects 
will have failed.


No, the projecs will fail if they are unable in serious way to stop forgery
and phishing. If they help with stopping spam, that will be an extra bonus.

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Point of Order: Incomplete, flawed response to MARID WG Charter (fwd), Dean Anderson SPF is not an antispam technology, Meng Weng Wong Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, william(at)elan.net <= Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Douglas Otis Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Douglas Otis DEPLOY: spam problem solved, addressed, or ???, Alan DeKok

Previous by Date:	Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson
Next by Date:	Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson
Previous by Thread:	Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson
Next by Thread:	Re: SPF is not an antispam technology, Dean Anderson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]