ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Sender-ID or SPF Classic

2004-09-01 17:33:38

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All: at present it appears to me that we are being forced by the
Microsoft license to leave Sender-ID behind. If we do not we will cause
implementation problems for a huge community of people running OSS MTA's
(the majority of internet MTA's in fact). This means that this working
group has a clear decision to make. Do we continue to press on with
Sender-ID and cause this problem or do we choose SPF-Classic and move
forward with it. In my own mind the choice is clear and I strongly urge
the group to support SPF-Classic and put this forward as our standard.

- --
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBNmpmv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAiVFAJ9JUD/iiN5X3Fy++wLnN37CH/ybYQCeNmHI
qetvIbjJiBx5BWVlGrWSPhM=
=AfhK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>