Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID

ietf-mxcomp

Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID

2004-09-01 18:26:58

I will argue here for abandoning Sender ID. I make some assumptions which 
could be refuted, but I believe that they are correct based on my 
experience. I encourage those who respond negatively to attack the 
particular points I am making and refute the facts I claim.


I second Mr. Gardner's motion.                     -- George Mitchell

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jonathan Gardner Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, mazieres Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, wayne Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Harold A'Hole Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark C. Langston Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Chip Mefford Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, George Mitchell <= RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, terry Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Hadmut Danisch Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jonathan Gardner Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Kevin Peuhkurinen Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Guillaume Filion

Previous by Date:	Sender-ID or SPF Classic, Chuck Mead
Next by Date:	Re: Updated Sender-ID License Faq (was acceptable use), wayne
Previous by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Chip Mefford
Next by Thread:	RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]