Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID



Interesting point, I agree with you.

And you gave me some inspiration:

Is it possible that this all was meant as an attack
against the Linux/GPL-World? That this was meant to 
undermine the GPL-based Linux distributions and to 
abuse a technology, which would surely be deployed
very fast and widely, everyone would have to use it, 
to piggyback some anti-GPL-antidote, to start softening
the pure-GPL world? 

Just a thought... 

regards
Hadmut

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, (continued) Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, mazieres Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, wayne Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Harold A'Hole Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark C. Langston Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Chip Mefford Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, George Mitchell RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, terry Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Hadmut Danisch <= Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jonathan Gardner Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Kevin Peuhkurinen Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Guillaume Filion Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jeremy T. Bouse Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Paul Iadonisi

Previous by Date:	[DEPLOY] Personal testimony, Kevin Peuhkurinen
Next by Date:	Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Kevin Peuhkurinen
Previous by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark
Next by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]