Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID


        I would concur with this motion as well. I see no further point
in trying to continue with Sender-ID with it's licensing issue which
make it unusable with GPL or other OSS licenses. I think SPF classic can
be adopted and if needed modified to meet the goals of MARID without the
inclusion of Sender-ID.

        Regards,
        Jeremy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, (continued) RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michael R. Brumm RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, terry Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Mark Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Hadmut Danisch Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jonathan Gardner Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Kevin Peuhkurinen Re: [DEPLOY] Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Guillaume Filion Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jeremy T. Bouse <= Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Paul Iadonisi Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, AccuSpam Another Rambus, Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Gordon Fecyk Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, wayne Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Andrew Newton RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Shaun Bryant

Previous by Date:	RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Date:	RE: The SSL license offer., Ryan Malayter
Previous by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Guillaume Filion
Next by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]