On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:49 PM, mazieres(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
[mailto:mazieres(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com] wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:55:52 -0700, Harry Katz
<hkatz(_at_)exchange(_dot_)microsoft(_dot_)com> wrote:
Second as per the terms of the license itself, End Users who are
recipients of a licensed implementation of Sender ID and
distributors
who are redistributing a branded licensed implementation do not need
to separately sign this License Agreement.
I understand your the point about End Users, but could you
clarify how the license exempts distributors? Specifically,
my concern is that while section 2.1 allows indirect
distribution of object code, section 2.2, which applies to
source code, does not.
Section 2.2 references 2.1 in a way that makes it permissible to
"indirectly" distribute the source code versions of the Licensed
implementations too. In other words, if you're redistributing a
licensed branded implementation - either source or binary - you don't
need to execute the license agreement.