Andrew Newton wrote:
[I]t is the opinion of the
co-chairs that MARID should not undertake work on alternate algorithms
reasonably thought to be covered by the patent application. We do feel
that future changes regarding the patent claim or its associated license
could significantly change the consensus of the working group, and at
such a time it would be appropriate to consider new work of this type.
I'm not sure if I get this right, and by reading the replies it seems
that we can't reach consensus of what you mean. hihihi
Reading point 3, I understand that the MARID co-chairs seek an
alternate, encumbered algorithm to replace the PRA algorithm. Is this
correct?
Regards,
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/