Re: Alternatives drafts for SUBMITTER identity2004-10-02 00:16:52On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:33:56AM -0700, william(at)elan.net <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> wrote a message of 1020 lines which said: 5.3 Interpreting the Results of SPF Verification...............6 I do not se why we should introduce a given verification (SPF) in the draft. SUBMITTER stands by itself. Of course, it is developed mostly for SPF but it may be used by other protocols. My advice: drop everything related to SPF.
|
|