ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Alternatives drafts for SUBMITTER identity

2004-10-02 00:16:52

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:33:56AM -0700,
 william(at)elan.net <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> wrote 
 a message of 1020 lines which said:

      5.3 Interpreting the Results of SPF
      Verification...............6

I do not se why we should introduce a given verification (SPF) in the
draft. SUBMITTER stands by itself. Of course, it is developed mostly
for SPF but it may be used by other protocols.

My advice: drop everything related to SPF.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Alternatives drafts for SUBMITTER identity, Stephane Bortzmeyer <=