Re: Status of MARID WG?


On Nov 23, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

That has been the cry of the COBOL lobby, the FORTRAN lobby and everygroup
that has promoted an obsolete legacy product as the future.


COBOL failed because RPG-III was superior!

-andy

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Status of MARID WG?, (continued) RE: Status of MARID WG?, Dean Anderson SenderID != SPF (Was: Status of MARID WG?), wayne RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Status of MARID WG?, Dean Anderson RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Status of MARID WG?, Dean Anderson RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Status of MARID WG?, Andrew Newton RE: Status of MARID WG?, Dean Anderson RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Status of MARID WG?, Andrew Newton <= Re: Status of MARID WG?, EdLevinson RE: Status of MARID WG?, MW Mike Weiner \(5028\)

Previous by Date:	RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Date:	Re: Status of MARID WG?, EdLevinson
Previous by Thread:	RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:	Re: Status of MARID WG?, EdLevinson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]