Gordon Fecyk wrote:
no press from the SPF crowd
The "SPF crowd" has a position on Sender-ID (Dec 2004): <http://www.OpenSPF.org/> A council was elected (December 2004): <http://spf.mehnle.net/> An updated draft was published (January 2005): <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt> SpamCop recommends SPF and / or domain keys (yesterday): <http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html> Other relatively new activities include: <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-02.txt> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-housley-mass-sec-review-00.txt> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-01.txt> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-03.txt> Bye, Frank (some remarks about RfC 3865 censored)