In <XrOhwSthhKOKU/eYIavAXA(_dot_)md5(_at_)prosecco(_dot_)oryx(_dot_)com> Arnt
Gulbrandsen <arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no> writes:
Just a question: Does that IESG member happen to think that SPF
suffers from poor workmanship?
I have heard no such direct comment on the "workmanship". I suspect
that many people in the IESG, like many others outside, find the
subject of MTA Authorization Records In DNS (MARID) to be a
controversial subject.
I think David Kessens comments indicate that he doesn't particularly
like SPF:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=30894
Russ Housley echos those concerns:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=31013
Harald Alvestrand seems to think that the wordsmithing, at least, is
pretty good:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=30972
It might be best to look at the entire datatracker for SPF:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=12662&rfc_flag=0
-wayne