ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2005-08-26 11:33:26


On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Graham Murray wrote:


Andrew Newton <andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> writes:


But since you brought this up: if you (the author of the document) do
not consider this to be an experiment, then perhaps the IETF should
not publish SPF as an Experimental RFC.


That would be a good idea. As there is already more than one implementation of the SPF protocol, should it not be possible to 'skip' the experimental phase
and go straight to the start of the standards track?

It should not be possible.  Please consult RFC 2026 and RFC 2418.

-andy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>