At 3:11 PM +0000 10/27/97, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* John W. Noerenberg wrote:
There are more substantive issues to address than whether we continue with
"packets" or adopt some new term for protocol data units.
Yes, so let's vote and forget the discussion. Making a ballot is the fastest
way to switch to a new topic. A ballot can be used for every non important
issuse. I'm not interested in the result. I can live with both results.
Lutz, let me speak more plainly. The chair will not hear further
discussion on this issue. The chair did not call for a straw poll. There
will be no vote on this.
I have heard no compelling reason to change the term. We will continue to
use "packets" to refer to PGP protocol data units.
Continuing in this vein is counterproductive.
john w noerenberg, ii
jwn2(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com
pager: jwn2(_at_)pager(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"The great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps
with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Self Reliance", 1841
--------------------------------------------------------------------