Re: patent freedom & compatibility

At 09:30 PM 11/6/97 +0000, Ian Grigg wrote:

OK, I'll ask directly, and we'll put this to bed.

Jeff, do you accept Ned Freed's post of today to Open PGP under "Re:
IETF process" as accurately describing the "Munich doctrine" and its
effect on this WG?


Its a good first approximation. Also remember Ned's comment about the IETF 
Process being dynamic.

                          -Jeff

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IETF process, Rodney Thayer patent freedom & compatibility, Adam Back Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Rodney Thayer Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Jeffrey I. Schiller <= Re: IETF process, Ned Freed Re: IETF process, Ian Grigg Re: IETF process, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: IETF process, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} Re: IETF process, Ned Freed Re: IETF process, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: IETF process, David P. Kemp Re: IETF process, Alain Zahm Re: IETF process, William H. Geiger III Re: IETF process, Bill Frantz

Previous by Date:	Re: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery, Adam Hoier
Next by Date:	Re: Symmetric Algorithm, Christopher Creutzig
Previous by Thread:	Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg
Next by Thread:	Re: IETF process, Ned Freed
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]