ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MessageID wording paranoia

1998-03-25 19:05:11
In 
<3(_dot_)0(_dot_)3(_dot_)32(_dot_)19980325172635(_dot_)00ab6a10(_at_)mail(_dot_)pgp(_dot_)com>,
 on 03/25/98 
   at 05:26 PM, Jon Callas <jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com> said:

It could, but there comes a point where we have to admit that some things
are beyond our control.

I don't see that this is an issue for OpenPGP-FORMATS, regardless. Even
there, though, I don't know what we'd say, and I don't think it's so
serious a problem that the spec should be held up for finding a
solution.

This isn't somthing I was looking for the group to address just an
observation for contemplation. :)

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/esecure.html                
        
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: This is a TAG-O-Matic
             Multi-line Sample
             Tag 

Attachment: pgpEsOYhcZYSZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>