Werner Koch <wk(_at_)isil(_dot_)d(_dot_)shuttle(_dot_)de> writes:
I like Tom's proposal. If someone can define the extension to the
signature packet (or a new one) I'll add it to GnuPG ASAP.
Hmmm, no comments on this for a week. Does this mean I should design
a new packet or extend the signature packet specs?
--
Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013