"John W. Noerenberg" <jwn2(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> writes:
Well, you have to identify the signature type, too. However the
changes sound minimal.
I still believe that putting large amounts of data into a signature
packet is not a good design - and therefore I don't think we really
need this.
What we need more, is an agreement on how to do the MDC packet and to
clarify some blocksize>64 issues.
know how to swallow? Will implementations be able to skip over them?
Sure, that's why we have version numbers.
--
Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013