[Top] [All Lists]

Re: V5 signatures

1999-07-07 09:50:59
"John  W. Noerenberg" <jwn2(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> writes:

Well, you have to identify the signature type, too.  However the 
changes sound minimal.

I still believe that putting large amounts of data into a signature
packet is not a good design - and therefore I don't think we really
need this.

What we need more, is an agreement on how to do the MDC packet and to
clarify some blocksize>64 issues.

know how to swallow?  Will implementations be able to skip over them?

Sure, that's why we have version numbers.

Werner Koch at            keyid 621CC013

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>