Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-01.txt

In our last episode ("Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-01.txt",
shown on 10/2/00), Ulf Möller said:

> The security notes still don't mention that there is a cryptographic
> flaw in v4 signatures.  This needs to be fixed, or if there are good
> reasons for not fixing it, it must at least be explained in the
> document.
Should we start killing hash algorithms, then?

        Jon