Re: El-Gamal signatures again2001-01-06 12:02:37El Gamal is apparently considered a Very Bad Thing. Don't do it. Then take it out of the specification. I understand that they're considered dangerous when implemented badly -- the spec already includes warnings. But since it's there, it should be accurate and complete. If we're afraid to simply take it out because someone may have generated such signatures, isn't it reasonable to specify it enough that others could verify them?
|
|