-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am a little bit curious, can you give a rational why the feature
flags are not bit encoded?
No. A byte vector seemed like a reasonable thing. I suppose we can do a bit
vector. Does anyone else have an opinion.
At first, I accepted the explanation in the current draft, that this act like
other "preferences". But the only preferences encoded that way are
algorithms lists; but algorithms are already encoded as bytes, and in
the lists, order matters. Features feel more like the keyserver or key
flags, which are bit-encoded.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3
iQEVAwUBO4XO72NDnIII+QUHAQH6VwgAr9IXyDWOmmZY7Vs+FSFfy9YkAIK1NsgM
ywboDlubSuF+O75kmr1CUEitE92/F6dgAaFIWWRTcURt3dkHCDwaq0fA0Rpmdv1r
WVcQT1NrHJR+yNvQa2Q4D/Gys9qez867pR79Vb8UYx2gqYI4J6s2DL/w2TuGN2Li
+QtDcAiR4OEJFJSsq6gQX6CjED9HYy5FNzyrML3so0yBa5XVpIvvUOhgHUKXSYog
SZJsfXCqId9fPGoxm4qDeKL7e6+ilzXFl9d8PwKckA+uXJyBW5Rk822NYwg4fzzX
+GDAwQrHz//wYdEZTeSyH4YokPTiWWwgo273O5raHFjTQQc3YegVDQ==
=nuhD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----