Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"?

[please leave attribution in when replying]

On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 11:49, Dominikus Scherkl wrote:

> > The mistake here, on Bob's part, is to reply to a message without
> > paying attention to the e-mail address being used
[...]

> The whole attack looks very suspicious to me...
I guess the correct 'solution' to prevent the 'attack' would be to file
bug reports with gpg-aware mail clients that do not at least display a
warning when replying to/forwarding an originally encrypted message
unencrypted.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
secure email with gpg                         http://fortytwo.ch/gpg

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part