ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?

2003-01-22 17:27:24

At 3:54 PM -0800 1/22/03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2003-01-22 23:37:54 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

On 2003-01-22 13:29:07 -0800, ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

I never suggested any such thing. What I suggest was a different
subtype of text.

Thanks for that suggestion.  Will look into it.

This message contains inline PGP material tagged as text/x-pgp.  I'd
be curious to learn what kind of behaviour this causes.  In
particular, are those whose user agents aren't prepared to handle
PGP by default able to display the "raw" clearsigned material
without problems?

Thanks, and kind regards,
- --
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler(_at_)does-not-exist(_dot_)org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBPi8vN9ImKUTOasbBAQL/iQgAvRAAcl/+s6dv9L3bo6LtJueHoZ3eR5KB
iUnq9lAky5KO2cKG+giS7R2MeSSt4/BvWezPWoCyoQjMoJvIWR3+e8sOB3OoFZhU
uJ+klrGP6LcXMeV0R1MOJ+pEEHVxEM8rHzcoEwaPkKCECC3WXg0c5R2PXNUO/723
EnV9dgtDo7kxz6WOo8heXlEP/2lSa9ogbTRaBgs4cx+QBBVbAEmTvxmzu1Jbjfg+
/WG/60lERXnnuJN3UE8nJcWMBJJKbacyijf4SaqX6PyknyGAr4FOIG7qguijIjpr
OpGHOdNbyadpST9Y7tqDVfH5ubKwTNRvKLjZr2zOT40ipAvWr9fT6A==
=CPvZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

My Eudora 3.1 doesn't seem to have a problem with it.  On the other hand, I
don't see any MIME headers when I view the full message.

Cheers - Bill


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz           | Sacred cows make the   | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506         | tastiest hamburgers.   | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz(_at_)pwpconsult(_dot_)com |         - David Wagner | Los Gatos, CA 
95032, USA