Re: Settling the TIGER question

Len Sassaman <rabbi(_at_)abditum(_dot_)com> writes:

> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, David Shaw wrote:
>
> > If TIGER/192 is removed, perhaps it would be good if HAVAL-5-160 was
> > removed as well, for the same reasons.
> Yes. And double-width SHA as well. Is there a reason for MD2?
SHA2 might be interesting in the not-to-distant future; I'd recommend
leaving it in.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
       derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com             www.ihtfp.com