Re: Clarification needed on compressed messages

On 8/2/03 2:37 PM, "David Shaw" <dshaw(_at_)jabberwocky(_dot_)com> wrote:

> I'd like to change that to:
>
> Literal Message :- Literal Data Packet |
>                    Literal Message, Literal Data Packet.
>
> The draft, as it stands now, is internally inconsistent.  I'd like to
> fix that.
Changed.

    Jon