At 11:12 AM 10/31/2003 -0500, Michael Young wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:37:18AM -0800, Trevor Perrin wrote:
>In my scenario, a bunch of different primary key holders trust a
>single subkey holder to perform signatures on their behalf. The
>subkey holder wants to make sure that each signature is attributed
>to the proper primary key.
I'd love to have a better framework for publicly expressing trust
relationships, but I really don't think this was one of the intended
uses of subkeys. [Given where the RFC stands, I think that trust
expresion would best be addressed by a new, adjunct RFC.]
Sure, no problem - I was just thinking we could slay these things with the
same stone, but in retrospect it seems like it only confuses an issue that
David had done a good job clarifying..
Trevor