[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some thoughts on a v5 key and why it shouldn't be a mess

2005-02-21 12:48:23

David Shaw wrote:

I also suggest that this not be a part of 2440bis.  The v5 discussions
will undoubtedly take a while, and delaying 2440bis for an unknown
(but probably long) period of time seems a shame.

As long as we are all agreed on that, I'm quite
keen to support a parallel track on new cleaned
up layouts.

What is the current status of 2440bis, BTW?

Is there a list of "things that must be complete" ?

It seems that every time we go around in a review
phase, another dozen minor fixes get proposed,
adopted, and then we start again!

At what point do we declare diminishing returns
to reviews?


News and views on what matters in finance+crypto: