David Shaw wrote:
I also suggest that this not be a part of 2440bis. The v5 discussions
will undoubtedly take a while, and delaying 2440bis for an unknown
(but probably long) period of time seems a shame.
As long as we are all agreed on that, I'm quite
keen to support a parallel track on new cleaned
up layouts.
What is the current status of 2440bis, BTW?
Is there a list of "things that must be complete" ?
It seems that every time we go around in a review
phase, another dozen minor fixes get proposed,
adopted, and then we start again!
At what point do we declare diminishing returns
to reviews?
iang
--
News and views on what matters in finance+crypto:
http://financialcryptography.com/