Re: Tighter MPI spec2005-02-27 16:28:25* Jon Callas: This language has been sitting in 2440 and followons since '97. No one has ever had a problem implementing it, no one has had an interoperability issue with bignums. Not PGP, nor GnuPG, nor Hushmail, nor Cryptix, nor Forum, nor Bouncy Castle, nor anyone else. Not true. GnuPG had a bug in MPI handling because it followed the language in RFC 2440 too verbatim. 8-) (You added a hint to 2440bis a few years ago, so others hopefully won't make the same mistake.)
|
|