Re: Stupid hash question?

On Tue, 31 May 2005 03:07:28 -0700, Jon Callas said:

> I believe Konrad Rosenbaum is correct, that it's a PKCS1/1.5
> content. The GnuPG guys would be best to comment, as they're the only
> ones who ever implemented them.
Frankly, I don't know this anymore because we have removed all Elgamal
signature code from GnuPG.  Old versions are still available and it
should be easy to figure out the format.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner