Re: "The OpenPGP mail and news header" extenssion

On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:24 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
<SNIP>
> > * sign(encrypt(message))
<SNIP>
> More importantly, perhaps, Krawczyk has shown that, in general, sign 
> then encrypt is insecure.
Which exact paper do you mean?

Also note that when you say that that is insecure you are also saying
that either/both the signing and/or the encryption are insecure in which
case the solution to the problem should be sought in a different
place...

Greets,
 Jeroen

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part