Re: Short intro on the K-R attack [Re: private key language]

Jon Callas wrote:
> * There must therefore be some security consideration note that calls
> out that implementations need to do consistency checks on keys,
> particularly when signing.
>
> I propose that we improve the packets when we do V5, but put in the
> security consideration now. Does that sound reasonable?
Yes.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff