Re: Suggested changes for DSA2


As an implementor, the question remains: when I verify a signature, what
q sizes should I allow for a given p?  For example, what q is OK for a p
of 1536?  What q is OK for a p of 4096?  Should I just make something up?
How is that going to promote interoperability?

Hal

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, (continued) Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, Ben Laurie Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, "Hal Finney" Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, Ian G Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, Daniel A. Nagy Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, Jon Callas Cost-benefit analysis of algorithm substitution, Ian G Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, "Hal Finney" <= Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, "Hal Finney" Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, Daniel A. Nagy Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, "Hal Finney" Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, "Hal Finney" Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw

Previous by Date:	[no subject], Sean Heeger
Next by Date:	Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw
Previous by Thread:	Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw
Next by Thread:	Re: Suggested changes for DSA2, David Shaw
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]