How about emailing the draft to this list without submitting it
to the I-D editor? Let people read it on the list and we'll see
if there is interest in resurrecting it.
-derek
Quoting Thomas Roessler <roessler(_at_)does-not-exist(_dot_)org>:
From the minutes of the OpenPGP meeting in Montreal:
Thomas Roessler gave a history of the Multiple Signature Draft.
It's an extension to RFC1847 to allow the "signature" portion
of the message to be a "multipart/mixed" and have a set of
signatures on the signed data instead of just a single
signature. This signature set could be a combination of
OpenPGP and e.g. S/MIME signatures.
On 2006-08-05 23:39:31 +0200, I wrote:
As a status update, I've dug out the (quite short) draft from
that old backup; before re-submitting it, I'm waiting for my
co-authors from back then to give me new contact information and
to ok submitting with the new IETF IPR boilerplate.
I haven't heard back from either Derek (whose contact information
I'd need), nor my co-authors from back then.
I'm tempted to consider my action item from Montreal done without
resurrecting this draft, and to suggest dropping this from the
charter -- unless there's a sudden surge of interest.
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler(_at_)does-not-exist(_dot_)org>
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com www.ihtfp.com
Computer and Internet Security Consultant