Hi,
I'm only going to answer parts of your question.
I hope you read the full mail. In footnote 3 a mistake was mentioned:
3. Note, that there is a further mistake: (f) doesn't even exist.
The list ends with (e).
I mean, in (a.2) and (a.3) the "(b)-(f)" has to be "(b)-(e)".
[Magic Dingus Encryption]
In such a case, when we write the RFC for MDE in OpenPGP, we would
need to state how you compute the fingerprint of an MDE key in that
RFC. That's it.
As long as no big inconsistencies occur, this is good, yes.
Imho it's easier just to say, that the size modulo 65536 is used.
Kind Regards,
Stephan Beyer
--
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer(_at_)gmx(_dot_)net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature