Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics

ietf-openpgp

Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics

2015-05-27 04:42:16

On Tue, 19 May 2015 12:02, wk(_at_)gnupg(_dot_)org said:

and put that into a public repo?  A good starting point might be to
merge 4880 with 5581 (Camellia) and 6637 (ECC).  With that all in one


Everyone to shy to comment on this?  I guess I have to take this then.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[openpgp] List problems?, Wyllys Ingersoll [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics (was: List problems?), Werner Koch Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Werner Koch <= Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Derek Atkins Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Werner Koch Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Derek Atkins Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Stephen Farrell Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Werner Koch Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Derek Atkins Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Stephen Farrell Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Werner Koch Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics (was: List problems?), Jon Callas

Previous by Date:	[openpgp] OPENPGP URI PROPOSAL (DRAFT), mofo syne
Next by Date:	[openpgp] rfc4880bis: Converted to pandoc and errata applied., Werner Koch
Previous by Thread:	[openpgp] rfc4880bis basics (was: List problems?), Werner Koch
Next by Thread:	Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis basics, Derek Atkins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]