Greetings,
I agree with you, on both points...
Christopher
On 24 Jul 2015, at 3:56, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Fri 2015-07-24 12:10:05 +0200, Stephen Farrell wrote:
The IESG has been asked to do a 5742 conflict review [3]
of a document that describes an application of PGP so
I thought I'd check here.
So the question is if the WG think there is any conflict
between this specification [4] and the work of this WG.
IMO the answer is no (having quickly scanned the document).
i also agree that the answer is "no" -- I do not think this spec
conflicts with the work of the WG. It's basically saying "use OpenPGP
to sign and/or encrypt the transcript before sending, with a specific
mime structure". we're not aiming to get in the way of that.
[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davin-eesst/
the ascii art here is kind of "wow".
--dkg
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
--
李柯睿
Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio
Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf
keybase: https://keybase.io/liljenstolpe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp